Improvements in reverse breakdown characteristics of THz GaAs Schottky barrier varactor based on metal-brim structure
Qi Lu-Wei1, 2, 3, Liu Xiao-Yu2, Meng Jin1, Zhang De-Hai1, Zhou Jing-Tao2, †
Key Laboratory of Microwave Remote Sensing, National Space Science Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Institute of Microelectronics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: zhoujingtao@ime.ac.cn

Abstract

The excellent reverse breakdown characteristics of Schottky barrier varactor (SBV) are crucially required for the application of high power and high efficiency multipliers. The SBV with a novel Schottky structure named metal–brim is fabricated and systemically evaluated. Compared with normal structure, the reverse breakdown voltage of the new type SBV improves from –7.31 V to –8.75 V. The simulation of the Schottky metal–brim SBV is also proposed. Three factors, namely distribution of leakage current, the electric field, and the area of space charge region are mostly concerned to explain the physical mechanism. Schottky metal–brim structure is a promising approach to improve the reverse breakdown voltage and reduce leakage current by eliminating the accumulation of charge at Schottky electrode edge.

1. Introduction

The research of astrophysics and earth science is the primary motivator for the development of high output power and high efficiency terahertz sources.[1,2] Multiplier based on solid-state sources is the critical technology for generating power at terahertz frequency.[3,4] GaAs Schottky diodes are the core device of high output power multipliers due to its large electron mobility and uniform epitaxial material quality.[5,6]

In recent research, the edge field effect on the interface between Schottky metal and semiconductor causes a lower breakdown voltage and a larger leakage current.[7,8] This can induce lower power handling capability and poor conversion efficiency of multipliers.[9] A novel Schottky metal–brim structure (SMB) can effectively eliminate the accumulation of charge caused by edge-field effect, which will increase the output power of multipliers.

In this study, GaAs planner SBV with Schottky metal–brim structure (SMB-SBV) which is shown in Fig. 1(a) is fabricated and experimentally studied for the first time. Compared with normal SBV (normal-SBV), the SMB-SBV shows better breakdown characteristics (19.6 % @ Schottky diameter is 3 μm). Combining the electric field and current density distribution extracted from simulations, the physical mechanism is discussed and explained.

Fig. 1 Cross sectional schematic of GaAs SBV (a) Schottky metal–brim structure and (b) normal structure.
2. Fabrication and simulation

The basic structures of the GaAs planner SBV are shown in Fig. 1. The epitaxial wafer is depicted as follows: a 30-μm-thick semi-insulating GaAs substrate serves as a supporting structure for the SBV devices; an epitaxial lattice-matched GaAs material including a 1.5-μm-thick heavily doped n-type GaAs layer (i.e., n+ GaAs buffer layer) and a 0.3-μm-thick lightly doped n-type GaAs layer (n-GaAs epi-layer), the doping concentrations of the two layers are ∼ 1018 cm−3 and ∼ 1017 cm−3, respectively.

The fabrications start with mesa isolation using wet etching.[10] Ti/Au metal-layers are deposited by E-beam evaporation as anode Schottky contacts. Ni/Ge/Au cathode ohmic contacts are then deposited. After metal contacts are finished, SMB structure is formed by wet etching aided a certain power ultrasound. Then, samples are passivated with 300-nm SiO2 and the dielectric layer existing on top of the metal contacts is removed by SF6 dry etching. The process is completed with interconnection metal electroplate to form gentle air bridge. Based on this SMB-SBV, the 225-GHz millimeter-wave integrated circuits (MMIC) are also produced. Figure 2(a) shows three anodes series GaAs SBVs and figure 2(b) shows the details of the SMB structure. The diameter of Schottky anodes in this paper is 3 μm. A Schottky anode with a diameter of 40 μm is also designed to analyze the physical mechanism of the SMB structure.

Fig. 2 Scanning electron microscope (SEM) photographs of (a) the fabricated GaAs SBVs, (b) Schottky metal–brim structure details.

The electrical simulations described in this paper are performed using Sentaurus TCAD tools.[11] The simulations with metal–interfacial layer–semiconductor (MIS) model which is shown in Fig. 3 are based on the literature in Refs. [12,15]. In the simulation, the two-dimensional (2D) structures are depicted in Fig. 1 and the doping levels are described above. Adequate numerical convergence is also reached by an optimized meshing, with nanometer grid spacing for the key electrical layers and their interfaces. The model is based on the basic drift-diffusion and Poisson equations for direct current (DC), breakdown characteristics, and small signal simulation.[13,14] The drift-diffusion for electrons and Poisson equations are given respectively by

where Jn is the electron current density, μn is mobility, n is electron density, p is hole density, mn is electron effective mass, γn is Boltzmann statistics, ε is electrical permittivity, ϕ is the electrostatic potential, P is the ferroelectric polarization, ND and NA are the concentrations of ionized donors and acceptors, q is the electron charge, k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature.

Fig. 3 Energy band diagram of MIS model.

This basic drift-diffusion model includes Fermi statistics, mobility with doping dependence and high velocity saturation model, carrier generation, and recombination, non-local tunneling, and band to band tunneling.

3. Measurement methods

The forward IV and reverse breakdown characteristics are measured with Agilent 4200 semiconductor parameter analyzer at room temperature. S-parameters is also measured by Agilent E8363B network analyzer to extract depletion layer capacitance. The test frequency range is 0.1 GHz–40 GHz. According to Taking’s studies in Ref. [16] the SBV is embedded in the ground–signal–ground (GSG) coplanar waveguide to measure the S-parameters of the coplanar waveguide. Three auxiliary structures, diode-open, diode-short, and pin-open are used to obtain the junction capacitance at 0-V bias (Cj0) by using the single-port open-short de-embedding method. Figure 4 shows the equivalent circuits of the three structures based on the work in Ref. [17]. Figure 5 shows the photograph and equivalent circuit of the actual SBV. The pad-to-pad capacitance Cpp, the finger-to-pad capacitance Cfp, the finger inductance Lf, and the finger resistance Rf are the parasitic parameters. Cj is the intrinsic voltage-dependent junction capacitance. Rs is the series resistance.

Fig. 4 The equivalent circuit of (a) diode-open, (b) diode-short, and (c) pin-open structure.
Fig. 5 (a) Photograph and (b) equivalent circuit of the actual SBV.

Under small-signal conditions (at an input power of –20 dBm), the magnitude and phase of the S-parameters are measured, which could directly convert to Y-parameters. The steps of extracting Cj0 are as follows:

In diode-open structure, Cpp is determined by

In diode-short structure, Lf and Rf are determined by

In pin-open structure, Cfp is determined by

The obtained Cpp, Lf, Rf, and Cfp are substituted into the equivalent circuit model of SBV which is shown in Fig. 5(b). The Cj0 is obtained by fitting the simulation results of S-parameters to the measurement results.

4. Result and discussion

According to the thermal electron emission model,[15] the current–voltage curve across the Schottky diode can be described by

where I0 is the reverse saturated current, n is ideal factor.[18]

Figure 6 shows the forward IV characteristics in a log scale and the turn-on voltage is 0.68 V as measured at a current of 1 μA. The ideal factor is a figure of merit that describes an unnecessary current path except the thermionic electron emission current, which is induced by interfacial disorder, interface state densities, electron tunneling current.[1921] The ideal factor is defined as

By numerical fitting using formula (3), the ideal factor (n) and the effective barrier height (ϕ(V)) could be calculated. The series resistance (Rs) is also extracted based on the report in Ref. [22], which is shown in Table 1. The SMB-SBV has a similar ideal factor, series resistance, and barrier height as normal-SBV.

Fig. 6 Forward IV characteristics with different structures in log scale; full line: measured; dashed line: simulated. The inset shows the IV in linear scale.

The breakdown characteristics with different structures of SBV are shown in Fig. 7. In order to investigate the improvements in reverse breakdown characteristics of SMB-SBV, a current of 1 μA for defining the breakdown voltage of SBV is used.[23] The GaAs SBV with different structures has the breakdown voltage of the order of –8.75 V for SMB structure and –7.31 V for normal one, respectively. The results show that SMB-SBV has the advantage of high breakdown voltage. The leakage current caused by electron tunneling is significantly lower than that of normal-SBV. Simulated results based on the MIS model and measurement results show a good agreement as shown in Figs. 6 and 7. So, multipliers based on SMB-SBV will have larger power handling capability and better power conversion efficiency.

Fig. 7 Variations of breakdown characteristics with different structures.

Furthermore, the breakdown characteristics of SBVs with a Schottky junction diameter of 40 μm are shown in Fig. 8. Due to the large difference of anode area, the normalized current density is used to compare the influence of the edge electric field effect of different areas on the breakdown characteristics. The current value corresponding to the same current density is marked in Fig. 8. It shows that the breakdown voltage is –7.29 V for SMB structure and –6.75 V for normal structure at the same order of leakage current density. It reveals that the improvements in reverse breakdown characteristics of SMB structure obviously decreases with the increasing of anode area. Accordingly, SMB structure might increase the utility of SBV for THz multipliers where the anode area must be decreased in order to achieve greater application frequency.

Fig. 8 Variations of breakdown characteristics with different structures at Schottky diameter of 40 μm. The inset shows the IV curve in linear scale.

The measurement and fitting data of the S-parameters are shown in Fig. 9, and they are in good agreement. The extracted junction capacitance at 0-V bias (Cj0) is 13.7 fF for SMB structure and 16.5 fF for normal structure, respectively. The Cj0 of SMB-SBV is less than that of normal structure, which shows a larger capacitance modulation ratio (Cmax/Cmin). The SMB-SBV shows better conversion efficiency because of its uniform capacitance modulation ration.

Fig. 9 Measurement and fitting data of S21 at the frequency range of 0.1 GHz–40 GHz.
Table 1.

Parameters of SBVs with different structures.

.

In order to investigate the physical mechanism of SMB with excellent reverse breakdown characteristics, simulations are carried out to precisely extract the distribution of electric field and space charge area at the same reverse bias voltage. The difference between the depletion layer region and the electric field distribution of these two structures is shown in Fig. 10. At the edge of the anode electrode, the maximum electric field of normal structure is approximately 4.5 times of the SMB structure one, which suffers from the electric field crowding near the metal edge. This would induce local breakdown in advance, especially happened between the anode and cathode region.[24] From Fig. 11, it is obvious that the leakage current mainly comes from the edge of the depletion layer. The normal SBV has a narrow depletion layer near the edge of the anode electrode. It causes an increase in Cj0 calculated from the formula as a function of Cj0

where Wbi is zero bias depletion width, γ is fringing capacitance factor. Aa is the area of anode.[20]

Fig. 10 Depletion layer area (white line) and electric field distribution near the edge of the anode metal of (a) normal-SBV, (b) SMB-SBV, (c) cross-section of the electric field distribution.
Fig. 11 Distribution of leakage current density across the anode depletion layer. The abscissa corresponds to the horizontal depletion layer distribution (x axis in Fig. 10) and the dotted line is the center of the anode.

The SMB structure provides electric field relief and uniform depletion layer distribution, reducing the magnitude of the electric field. The SMB-SBV shows excellent electrical performance because it completely eliminates the accumulation of charge at Schottky electrode edge.

5. Summary

In summary, the GaAs SBV with SMB structure is fabricated and systemically evaluated. With SMB structure, the reverse breakdown voltage increases from –7.31 V to –8.75 V. The Cj0 is reduced from 16.5 fF to 13.7 fF due to SMB structure ignoring the fringe capacitance factor. SMB structure would not cause the degradation of other SBV characteristics, such as ideal factor, reverse saturation current, and series resistor. The distributions of the leakage current and the electric field are extracted by Sentaurus TCAD tools, which reveal that SMB structure can eliminate the accumulation of charge at Schottky electrode edge induced by edge-field effect. The reverse breakdown voltage will be larger if SMB etching process is optimized. Through a series of comparisons, the GaAs SBV with SMB structure shows significantly better electrical characteristics including larger breakdown voltage, lower leakage current, and larger capacitance modulation ratio, which is beneficial to high power and high efficiency multipliers application.

Reference
[1] Chattopadhyay G 2011 IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 1 33
[2] Marso M 2010 The Eighth International Conference on Advanced Semiconductor Devices and Microsystems 147 10.1109/ASDAM.2010.5666326
[3] Dhillon S S Vitiello M S Linfield E H Davies A G Hoffmann M C Booske J 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 043001
[4] Mittleman D M 2018 Opt. Express 26 9417
[5] Hou D Chen J Yan P 2018 IEEE Trans. Terahertz Sci. Technol. 1 10.1109/TTHZ.2017.2786027
[6] Martin S Nakamura B Fung A Smith P Bruston J Maestrini A 2001 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Sympsoium Digest 1641 10.1109/MWSYM.2001.967219
[7] Lewis J A Wasserstrom E 1970 Bell Syst. Tech. J. 49 1183
[8] Huang Y Jayaprakash K V A Cheung C 2014 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition-APEC 2902 10.1109/APEC.2014.6803716
[9] Liang S Song X Zhang L Lv Y Wang Y Wei B Feng Z 2020 IEEE Electron Dev. Lett. 1 10.1109/LED.2020.2981939
[10] Liu X Y Zhang Y Xia D J Ren T H Zhou J T Guo D Jin Z 2017 Chin. Phys. Lett. 34 070701
[11] Schwarz M Kloes A 2016 IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 63 2757
[12] Nawawi A Tseng K J Amaratunga G A J Umezawa H SHikata S 2013 Diamond Relat. Mater. 35 1
[13] Goossens R J G Beebe S Yu Z Dutton R W 1994 IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 310 10.1109/43.265673
[14] Trojnar A H Valdivia C E LaPierre R R 2016 IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics 6 1494
[15] Neamen Donald A 2003 Semiconductor physics and devices: basic principles NY McGraw-Hill 212 10.1063/1.3068927
[16] Taking S 2012 AlN/GaN MOS-HEMTs technology Doctoral dissertation Glasgow University of Glasgow 10.1587/transele.E94.C.835
[17] Ren T Zhang Y Liu S Guo F Jin Z Zhou J Yang C 2017 J. Infrared, Millimeter, Terahertz Waves 38 143
[18] Tang A Y Drakinskiy V Sobis P Vukusic J Stake J 2009 34th International Conference on Infrared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves 1 10.1109/ICIMW.2009.5325563
[19] Ellis J A Barnes P A 2000 Appl. Phys. Lett. 76 124
[20] McLean A B Dharmadasa I M Williams R H 1986 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 1 137
[21] Maeda K Ikoma H Sato K Ishida T 1993 Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 2560
[22] Kiuru T Mallat J Raisanen A V Narhi T 2011 IEEE Trans. Microwave Theor. Techniq. 59 8
[23] Saini K S 2003 Development of frequency multiplier technology for ALMA https:////citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.112.6968
[24] Narita T Kikuta D Takahashi N Kataoka K Kimoto Y Uesugi T Sugimoto M 2011 Phys. Status Solidi 208 1541